Pleasure - Morality Essay Example for Free

Pleasure Morality EssayMill is an heir of an intellectual movement in England hold upn as Utilitarianism utilitarianism is concerned with the acquisition of pleasure and excreting of pain. John Stuart Mill follows the guidelines of utilitarianism in order to decide if certain processs are moral. Utilitarianism states that a person should perform the action that stools the most pleasurable outcome for either person involved. In order to accurately judge if one pleasure is greater than another, the person must be unprejudiced and have experienced both much(prenominal) judges will prefer the higher pleasures over the lower ones. However, Mill recognizes that people arent always driven to follow moral kindly standards, because the reasons behind their actions can be not only external but internal as well. What Mill means is that expectations of us from our peers and from a higher being, such as God, do not obligate us to follow these rules set out by society it is our own fee ling within that holds us accountable to these standards. Lastly, Mill believes that in order to be a moral creature, we must obey the three conditions of utility 1) Goodness is understood as production of blessedness, voiding of pain, 2) for all of those concerned with the action, and 3) each counts for one and no more than one. Utilitarians believe that a persons actions are right if they clear happiness the greatest happiness of greatest number,(Denise, Peterfreund, and White, p. 158). Michael, Peter and Samir are employees at Initech and are planning swipeming the company by installing a computer virus that skims money out of the companys bank account. Mill would look at this action by looking at the conditions of utilitarianism.Although they meet the first criteria of producing happiness through the elimination of pain by acquiring large amounts of money, they do not meet part two or three. In regards to part two, it does produce happiness for the ones directly performing the scam but it indirectly affects the other members work for Initech as well as stakeholders and thus causes pain for those indirectly affected. Lastly, the tierce condition to count for one and only one is not met because a lot of people are involved. Mill also considers that in order for an action to be moral, it must come from within.Peter, being the leader of this scam, has no internal morals or considerations for those around him. Michael and Samir are only involved in this scam because they are the brains in this operation and it wouldnt be possible to perform this action otherwise. Mill believes that although people are motivated by their own desires and they shouldnt act on them. However, Peter, Michael, and Samir do just that. Mill thinks that when people are excessively fortunate that they are in loose of enjoying it because it only benefits themselves.This goes to show that their scam is nefarious because it only directly increases their happiness due to their own se lf-interests. Also, Mill argues that a person with high capacities will need more to make him happy and therefore is capable of experiencing larger quantities of pain however, they still shouldnt allow this to lower their expectations and faculties. Although Peter has experienced a prolonged period of pain while working at Initech through tedious tasks and constant pressure from his eight bosses, this should not be a good enough reason for him to affect others faculties and reduce their value as human beings.Mill says, it is greater to be a man dissatisfied than a pig satisfied, (p. 162). In other words, Peter is not capable of experiencing the highest form of pleasure, and therefore chooses to increase the lower pleasures, lowering his existence in the world. Many people who start off wanting everything which is moral sometimes override to selfish measures. The reason why so many people end up becoming selfish is due to being in occupations that lower their aspirations of somethi ng greater which may be a reason why Michael, Peter, and Samir choose to go through with this scam.They are not unprejudiced judges because they do not know what higher pleasures consist of due to lack of opportunity. Considering all of these utilitarian schemes, Mill would argue that although on the surface Michael, Samir, and Peter seem to be acting immorally, they could maybe be unable to accurately judge both the higher and lower pleasures because they were not capable of enjoying the higher pleasures.