Doubt Is the Key to Knowledge

suspect is the distinguish to acquaintance (Persian Proverb). To what extent is this true in twain argonas of hunch forwardledge? Firstly, to understand fully the indicaterb, definitions should be given. Doubt is the psychological status of cosmos stuck between believing and disbelieving, involving uncertainty and mistrust in a particular item or restitution or when at that place is lack of hard evidence and facts to funding the wholeeged information, action, motive or decision.When you top dog a nonion or you argon open to inquisition or inspection of it, you be having head. Only when you tummy disclose the unspoiltification for your doubt, maven that satisfies whatever convinces you to gestate otherwise, past you bequeath no hour retentive flip doubts. To have existledge is wish to have an explanation, understanding or reason to things in the world. Knowledge batch be both personal and collective, and non all association is a fact. The big tap sch eme , the theory of relativity, and the string theory etc. rovides us explanations and reasoning to wherefore the world is the way it is. These theories argon what we know tho ar non needfully the fact we do not know if these theories are correct, hardly still cunning these theories count as our knowledge. Knowledge posterior come from our personal make as well. This examine will work throughk to breed the extent to which doubt is manifested as a key to knowledge regarding devil areas of knowledge, experience and History. fit to Academic Press Dictionary of comprehension & Technology, science is the systematic observation of inseparable categoricalts and motives in order to discover facts somewhat them and to formulate laws and principles based on these facts and to a fault the organized body of knowledge that is derived from such observations and that crumb be verified or tryed by further setigation. at that place is a view that science is seen as provision al, which means that it is subjected to beingness falsified.In an ever-developing world were saucy discoveries are make all the measure postulateing to tonic theories and originalizations, gray-haireder theories are always at the threat of being falsified. Even the new theories, the scientific society will vigorously doubt and notice whatsoever ideas until enough evidence is produced to punt them up. It is without ground to say that the basis of scientific growth is on inferred or nevertheless imagined hypotheses by scientist in an attempt to reach or explain something new or unexplained.Experiments are carried out and positive results can turn these hypotheses into theories and possibly knowledge, of course until they are doubted and contested against by new theories that explores the emulation of the theory in question. Throughout the taradiddle of Science, knowledge has been derived from the selfsame processes. In wee Mesopotamian theatre of operations, the unde rcoat was believed to be a flat disk with a dome, until Ferdinand Magellan managed to canvas that body politic was spherical after successfully circumnavigating the landed estate in the 15th Century.Another example would be of the Italian physicist Galileo Galilei who, condescension the endless controversy, review and denouncing made against him, proved false the long withheld notion of the geocentric view that the footing was at the center of the Universe. Thus, it is evident that finished the use of scientific theories, unless disproved otherwise, knowledge is updated and will remain as such through continual doubt. Hence we can see that as long as thither is doubt, new things will be explored and old laws energy be disproved of although it is perceived as knowledge to every nonpareil.Although doubt leads to much and more correct viewpoint of an issue, we can never be certain that what we think of as knowledge now is definitely the real truth and can never be disproved . However, with that being give tongue to, I believe that doubt and doubt alone cannot be the fillet of sole key to gain scientific knowledge, but continual doubt can really leads to wasting of time and effort and pip is to eliminate the correct fact that is cipher to be true which can lead to a regression of knowledge.Firstly, in that respect are many theories in science that remain in the gray area that cannot be logically turn out with our current knowledge, deal for example the existence of black holes. No scientists have been successful in proving its existence. However, one of the many theories of the black hole might actually be true but as nobody can prove it so, scientists in the field may invest pointless effort into developing new theories instead of directing that effort into proving the theory, which is actually true. Also there are truths that can never be doubted or proven otherwise exchangeable the fact that the Earth orbits around the word.Thus, although do ubt lends to the progress of science and hence knowledge, it also has limitations which might prove detrimental to the growth of knowledge. The next issue is that of religion. religious belief is a collection of heathenish systems, imprint systems, and worldviews that relate humanity to otherworldliness and, sometimes, to moral values. According to New York multiplication writer Peter Steinfels, published in July 19, 2008, religion is no longer identical it was in the past when religious reliance was present in everything people do, even for oubters. Nowadays it is almost inevitable that believers must live in a condition of doubt and uncertainty. We often think that there is no room for doubt at bottom faith, that doubt is weakness. Even worse, most bourgeois faiths regard doubt as something to be battled against because it is dangerous to ones faith. It can lead to heresy, discredit the existence of God, and, according to their belief, by chance divergence of salvation and eternal torture in the fires of Hell.Of course , it had been pointed out by religious thinkers a long time ago that being doubtful about a religion is not the opposite arctic of the religion but it is actually the develop way of having faith rather than filmdom belief. Personally, although I am a pricey Buddhist, many a time I have found myself doubting my cause religion. For example, I sometimes question whether there is such thing called karma or does everything honourable happen by chance and karma is full a way to scare believers into doing trade good deeds for they fear of having to suffer the wake afterwards. in the long run there are people who are kind-hearted and yet still suffer every day. I found my answer not long ago about how it is related to to another issue of reincarnation and take over karma. I did feel criminal of doubting Buddha and his words but then I learned that he said Do not accept any of my words on faith, Believing them just because I sa id them. Be like an analyst buying gold, who cuts, burns, And critically examines his result for authenticity. Only accept what passes the test By proving useful and beneficial in your life.The Buddha (Jnanasara-samuccaya) Doutb, to Buddha is requisite because there is no point in following a religion blindly. According to the Buddha, religion should be left to ones stimulate free choice. Religion is not a law, but a disciplinary command which should be followed with understanding. Thats why the Buddha told his disciples not to blindly follow his teachings but test them and verify them through their own experience like a goldsmith tests the uprightness of gold. However sometimes fir belief in the spiritual side of things can be necessary or at least solid.In the book The Age of Doubt Tracing the Roots of Our Religious uncertainness, an example of a 20-year-old boy was given. He is of an agreeable and intellectual appearance, but hes before long beset with existential and re ligiously-inflected questions, tied to his faith, that he feels compelled to ask his doctor What am I? What are all these things that are made like me? Why am I? . Why am I? is perhaps the most remarkable of these questions, with religion oblation an answer more confident and sheltering than science perhaps ever could.But as his doctor explains, the patient finds no comfort in theology. He is in one sense suspended between two options, greater faith and firmer uncertainty, yet uncomplete strikes him as possible or appealing. Ultimately religions are spiritual havens that most followers take refuge in and by constantly doubt its truth, it defeats the purpose of having religions as people are always have this insecurity that what they are doing, adhering to may not do any good to them despite what their religions says.In conclusion, due to the broadness and ambiguity of the knowledge areas of Science and History, it is impossible to accurately quantify doubt and its ability to p resent itself as the key to attaining knowledge. Nonetheless, through careful study and research on these various areas of knowledge, this essay presents the stand that doubt, to a large extent, is an natural and important factor as the key to knowledge. 1505 words - 2 . Sharpe, Alfred. Doubt. The Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 5 (New York Robert Appleton). Retrieved 2008-10-21. 3 . http//blogs. yis. ac. jp/13hwangj/2011/09/05/definition-of-knowledge/ 4 . http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Religioncite_note-0 5 . http//www. nytimes. com/2008/07/19/us/19beliefs. hypertext markup language 6 . http//viewonbuddhism. org/dharma. html 7 . http//www. budsas. org/ebud/whatbudbeliev/277. htm