Do God Exist ?

thesis Statements 1. Because of mans ignorance and curiosity, leanings for the populateence of divinity begin been made over the years. Basically, these logical motives argon divided into dickens large groups i. e. logical and metaphysical. Actually, these line of productss seek to prove that the population of a being or having faith with at least one attri fur on that point that only beau cerebrationl could defend is logically necessary. 2. Believing and having faith in God forget only resort to one amourgoodness. 3. Faith has just aboutthing to do with ones conception active God. 4. The live onence of God remains a matter of faith since its exhausting to prove God to someone who does non believe. . There are arguments that attempts to give information of what they bang about the live onence of God. And thats it. It is now our choice if we believe or non but the important thing is we must hold on in our faith. Read morehttp//ivythesis. typepad. com/term_paper _topics/2010/02/thesis-statements-results-of-having-faith-in-god. htmlixzz2CwZzjm00 4 Primary Arguments for Gods foundation Written by Michael Vlach. Perhaps the hottest topic in all of philosophy concerns the globe of God. Thus the uncertaintyDoes God live? Our answer to this question affects how we view the world, how we be look at, and what we expect for the future.If God exists, then we are plausibly accountable to this God. The universe may have meaning and resolve. Plus, our knowledge existence may not give the axe at physical death. If God does not exist, however, then we are probably here by disaster and are not accountable to some transcendent being. This life may be all we have, so live your life however you see fit and enjoy it. Traditionally, thither have been four major(ip) arguments for Gods existence (1) the cosmological argument (2) the teleological argument (3) the ontological argument and (4) the good law argument.Below are explanations of each of the ar guments and the common responses to them. 1. Cosmological Argument The term cosmological comes from the Greek intelligence activity kosmos which means world. The cosmological argument for Gods existence goes like this The world could not exist on its own so there must have been a source cause that brought it into being. This low cause is God. Or enjoin some other representation, the universe could not just exist on its ownsomeone or something must have made it. This cause of the universe is God. Three criticisms of the cosmological argument have been offered.First, some show matter is eternal and is not in need of a first cause. Second, some say If everything needs a cause, what caused God? Third, some say that even if it is true that some being caused our universe to exist, this does not prove the existence of the Christian God. All it yields is that there is some omnipotent being that created the universe, but this does not necessarily mean that this creator was the G od of the Bible. 2. Teleological Argument The teleological argument is also known as the argument from design (The Greek word telos means purpose or design. ).The argument goes like this The universe evidences great abstruseity or design thus, it must have been designed by a great Designer or God. The argument from design can be likened to a watch. A watch is obviously made by a watchmaker. The world, which is much more complex than a watch, must also have been designed by a great Designer or Divine Watchmaker (God). In sum, the teleological argument asserts that the universe evidences too much complexity to be the product of random chance. We know that the celestial bodies move with perfect accuracy in their orbits. Our bodies, too, are improbably complex.According to the teleological argument, theres just no way all this complexity could just happen. God must have created it all. There have been three responses to the teleological argument. First, some say the teleological argu ment is guilty of a weak analogy because it assumes a significant resemblance between natural objects (ex. rocks, trees) and objects we know have been designed (ex. watches, skyscrapers). Thus, canvas natural objects with objects we know have been created by humans is like comparing apples and oranges. The analogy just doesnt work.Second, some say that the theories of the big bang and evolution better pardon the complexity in the universe. Third, some say that even if the teleological argument is true, it does not prove the existence of the Christian God. 3. Ontological Argument The third argument for Gods existence is the ontological argument. This argument is unlike the cosmological and teleological arguments in that it does not argue from evidence in the natural world. Thus, it is not a cause and effect argument. The ontological argument can be stated in this way God is the greatest being imaginable.One of the aspects of perfection or greatness is existence. Thus, God exists. Or put another wayThe fact that God can be conceived means that he must exist. This argument for Gods existence was developed by the twelfth century theologian and philosopher, Anselm. It is based on Anselms declaration that God is that which nothing greater can be conceived. The ontological argument has been very controversial. withal many who believe in Gods existence question its validity. A contemporary of Anselm named Guanilo responded to Anselm. Guanilo verbalise that one could imagine a perfect island but that did not mean a perfect island exists.Others have give tongue to you can imagine a unicorn but that does not mean unicorns exist. Thus, many challenge the idea that the idea of God must mean that God exists. 4. Moral Law Argument Another argument for the existence of God is the moral law argument. It goes like this Without God morality would be impossible. There must be a Lawgiver (God) who originates and stands by moral law. A universal moral law cannot exist accid entally. There must be a basis behind itGod. According to this view, every person is born(p) with an inherent understanding of right and wrong.Everyone, for instance, understands that killing an innocent person is wrong. Everyone understands that helping a drowning person is right. Where did this national understanding of right and wrong come from? According to adherents of the moral law argument, this understanding comes from God. He put it into the hearts of every person. There have been two responses to the moral law argument. First, some deny that there are universal truths. Many today believe that truth is subjective and relative. Societies and individuals determine what is true for them, but there is no God that does this.Second, some say that the presence of reprehensible in the world argues against a Moral Lawgiver. If God is all-powerful and all-good, how can evil exist in the world? The arguments and counterarguments for Gods existence remain controversial. The cosmolog ical, teleological, and moral law arguments remain popular with Christian apologists today. The ontological argument is not as well received although some today still asserts its validity. It should be noted that most Christian theologians and philosophers believe that God never intended for his existence to be something that could be proven with 100% certainty.They rase out that faith is an important component in understanding God and his existence. Argumentsfor and against theexistence of Godhave been proposed by philosophers, theologians, scientists, and others for thousands of years. Inphilosophicalterms, arguments for and against the existence ofGodinvolve primarily the sub-disciplines ofepistemology(theory of knowledge) andontology(nature of god) and also thetheory of value, since concepts of perfection are connected to notions of God. The debate concerning the existence of God is one of the oldest and most discussed debates inhuman history.A wide variety of arguments exist which can be categorized asmetaphysical,logical,empirical, orsubjective. The existence of God is subject to lively debate in philosophy,1thephilosophy of religion, andpopular culture. The Western tradition of the existence of God began withPlatoandAristotle, who made arguments for Gods existence that would now be categorized ascosmological arguments. Later,Epicurus hypothesise theproblem of evil if God isomnipotent,omniscientandomnibenevolent, why does evil exist?The field oftheodicyarose from attempts to answer this question. Other thoughts about the existence of God have been proposed bySt. Anselm, who formulated the firstontological argumentIbn Rushd (Averroes)andAquinas, who presented their own versions of the cosmological argument (thekalamargumentand thefirst way), respectivelyDescartes, who said that the existence of a benevolent God waslogically necessaryfor the evidence of the senses to be meaningful andImmanuel Kant, who argued that the existence of God can be deduced from the existence ofgood.Thinkers who have provided arguments against the existence of God includeDavid Hume, Kant,NietzscheandBertrand Russell. In young culture, the question of Gods existence has been discussed by philosophers and scientists such asStephen Hawking,Richard Dawkins,Daniel Dennett,Richard Swinburne,William Lane Craig, andAlvin Plantinga. Atheists maintain that arguments for the existence of God show insufficient tenability to believe. Certaintheistsacknowledge that belief in the existence of God may not be amenable to demonstration or refutation, but rests onfaithalone, a position calledfideism.TheCatholic Churchmaintains that knowledge of the existence of God is available in the natural light of human reason alone. 2Other religions, such asBuddhism, do not concern themselves the existence of gods at all. Does God live on? byTawa Anderson Is there a God? 1How can you besurethat God exists? butt end youproveto me that God is real? Does the existence (or lack thereof) of God make any significant remainder? Was Nietzsche right in declaring God is dead ? These questions strike at the very heart of human existence, and countersign out for our personal attention and deliberation.Furthermore, these questions must be answered before we can inquire into the truth of Christianity. afterward all, if there is no God, then Jesus certainly isnt God in the flesh If there is no God, there is no Christian faith worth considering. In this brief essay, I will share three persuasive clues (traditionally called arguments or proofs) that point to the existence of God. This is not an apologetic forChristianity, but rather for basictheism an argument that God exists, not an argument that theChristianGod is real. God ExistsGod must exist because something must have caused the first moment in time and that something is God. This is summarized by, SaintThomas Aquinasin his theory of cause. He presented five arguments for the existence of god in his masterwork theSum ma Theologiae. In the argument about accident he stated the following set forth 1. Thenatural worldincludes final results that occur. 2. In thenatural world, every event has a cause, and no event causes itself. 3. In thenatural world, causes must precede their effects. 4. In thenatural world, there are no infinite cause/effect chains. 5.Hence there is anentity outsideof nature (a supernatural being), which causes the first event that occurs in the world. In ourfinite worldof existence, an event cannot cause itself, and if there is no first cause, there would not be any effects. So, God is the first cause. God must exist since all his premises are all in support of his conclusion that the first cause is God. An atheist is likely to say that the Big Bang was the first cause, but Aquinass premises and conclusion will disprove this theory, as we will view later. I agree with this theory of cause, because I believe that our existence could